Project Northland - a multi-level long-term intervention combining behavioural with environmental approaches

At a glance

Country of origin

  • USA

Last reviewed:

Age group
11-14 years
15-18/19 years
Target group
Pupils aged 12-18 years
Programme setting(s)
Community
Family
School

Project Northland is a six-year intervention delivered over seven academic years from middle to high school; however a shortened, 3-year version may also be used in grades 6, 7 and 8 (11-14 years of age). It is a multi-level intervention that includes demand (individual level) and supply (environmental level) reduction strategies. Its main intervention components include classroom curricula, peer leadership, youth-driven extra-curricular activities, parent involvement programmes and community activism. By intervening on multiple levels, Project Northland strives to teach students skills to effectively negotiate social influences to drink, while at the same time directly modifying the social environment of young people (i.e. peers, parents, school and community).

Keywords

No data

Contact details

Professor Cheryl L. Perry, PhD
Professor and Regional Dean
University of Texas School of Public Health
Email: Cheryl.L.Perry[a]uth.tmc.edu
Website: www.hazelden.org/web/go/projectnorthland

Overview of results from the European studies

Evidence rating

  • Possibly beneficial
About Xchange ratings

Studies overview

The programme has been evaluated in one cluster randomised controlled trial in Croatia. 26 primary schools were randomly allocated to intervention and control conditions - 948 students received the intervention and 1,033 acted as controls. Adolescents in the intervention group had significantly smaller increases in the Tendency to Use Alcohol score compared to the control group from baseline to year 2. The difference between groups from baseline to year 3 was not significant.

Click here to see the reference list of studies

Countries where evaluated

  • Croatia

Characteristics

Protective factor(s) addressed

  • Community: opportunities and rewards for prosocial involvement in the community (including religiosity)
  • Family: opportunities/rewards for prosocial involvement with parents
  • Family: parent involvement in learning/education
  • Individual and peers: interaction with prosocial peers
  • Individual and peers: refusal skills and decision making
  • Individual and peers: skills for social interaction
  • School and work: commitment and attachment to school
  • School and work: opportunities for prosocial involvement in education
  • School and work: rewards and disincentives in school

Risk factor(s) addressed

  • Community: laws and norms favourable to substance use and antisocial behaviour
  • Community: low neighbourhood attachment
  • Community: perceived availability of drugs/alcohol
  • Family: parental attitudes favourable to alcohol/drug use
  • Family: parental attitudes favourable to anti-social behaviour
  • Individual and peers: early initiation of drug/alcohol use
  • Individual and peers: favourable attitude towards alcohol/drug use
  • Individual and peers: gang involvement
  • Individual and peers: peers alcohol/drug use
  • Individual and peers: Romantic partner substance use
  • Individual and peers: sensation-seeking

Outcomes targeted

  • Alcohol use
  • Use of illicit drugs
  • Smoking (tobacco)

Description of programme

Project Northland provides six years of comprehensive programming for students beginning in sixth grade. Phase I provides programmes for 6th, 7th, and 8th graders (11-14 years of age). Each of the three years of programmes has a specific theme and incorporates individual, parent, peer and community participation. The students receive skills training in communicating with their parents about alcohol (6th grade; 11 years of age), dealing with peer influence and normative expectations about alcohol (7th grade; 12 years of age), and understanding methods that bring about community-level changes in alcohol-related programmes and policies (8th grade; 13-14 years of age).

Phase II of the programme is designed to help maintain the effects through high school. Phase II intervention strategies include community organising, parent education, youth development, media and school curriculum. The five intervention strategies are designed to increase communities’ efficacy in enacting changes in policies and practices related to high school students’ alcohol use.

Sixth grade: the ‘Slick Tracy Home Team’ programme consists of four weekly sessions of activity/story books that the students read and complete as homework with their parents. The books also include information on young adolescent alcohol use for parents. Small-group discussions about the books are held during school and at an evening fair at which students’ posters and projects are displayed. Community-wide task forces are created, including members from a cross-section of the community: government officials, representatives of the school and the business community, law enforcement personnel, health professionals, youth workers, parents, concerned citizens, clergy and adolescents.

Seventh grade: the ‘Amazing Alternatives!’ programme includes the following: an eight-week peer- and teacher-led classroom curriculum using interactive activities related to the themes of why young people use alcohol and alternatives to use, influences in terms of drinking, strategies for resisting those influences, normative expectations that most people their age do not drink, and intentions not to drink; a peer participation programme called T.E.E.N.S. creates alternative alcohol-free activities outside the classroom with the help of adult volunteers; and parental involvement through the use of booklets mailed to parents, which include behavioural prescriptions for parents and activities for parents and children to complete, as well as updated information on the programme and its events.

Eighth grade: ‘Power Lines’ consists of an eight-session classroom curriculum that introduces students to the ‘power’ groups within their communities that influence adolescent alcohol use and availability, and teaches community action/citizen participation skills. Students interview parents, local government officials, law enforcement personnel, school teachers and administrators, and alcohol retailers about their beliefs and activities concerning adolescent drinking; they also organise a town meeting to make recommendations for community action to prevent alcohol use. A theatre production is performed at each school for classmates, parents and community members. T.E.E.N.S. continues to provide alternative activities in all intervention school districts. A newsletter written by and for eighth grade students is sent to parents and peers. Finally, the community-wide task force continues its activities aimed at limiting access to alcohol.

Ninth grade: during the interim phase, a brief five-session classroom programme entitled ‘Shifting Gears’ is implemented. This programme focuses on pressures to drink and drive or to ride with a drinking driver, the influences and tactics of alcohol advertising, and ways to deal with those influences. No programmes are implemented in grade 10.

Eleventh and twelfth grades (1997-1998): Phase II consists of five components designed to reinforce and complement the previous goals of Project Northland. The ‘Class Action’ programme is implemented during Phase II, using a substance abuse prevention curriculum that can be used as a booster session for the Project Northland series or as a stand-alone curriculum. ‘Class Action’ builds on the early adolescent interventions with new strategies for the cohort’s last years in high school, while emphasising changes in the social environment of young people. The six-session curriculum is based on the social influences theory of behavioural change; students are asked to debate and discuss the social influences that might lead them to use alcohol and the negative consequences that those influences have not only on the individual teen but on the community as a whole. Through an innovative, civil-trial approach, ‘Class Action’ challenges high-school students to examine the real-world consequences, both legal and social, of teenage alcohol use.

The programme is peer-led and uses interactive methods to accomplish its instructional goals. Students debate and discuss the consequences of substance abuse, thus changing the social norms around alcohol use and changing negative peer pressure into positive peer pressure.
Community and parent components of Project Northland are also continued during the implementation of ‘Class Action.’ Eleven action teams, representing all communities and ranging in size from five to twelve members are formed and asked to encourage community adoption of institutional or policy solutions to underage drinking through a number of sponsored activities and awareness campaigns. The parent component involves a postcard campaign designed to increase awareness about alcohol-related issues and encourage specific actions to keep adolescents alcohol free. A total of 11 postcards designed to correspond to events sponsored by the action teams are posted to the cohort’s parents at six-week intervals.

A new parent-child intervention, ‘Sound OFF!’, is used in the second year to encourage parents and their children to communicate about alcohol. A series of three mail-outs are sent to parents and children in November, January, and February, with discussion questions regarding teen drinking. Students are asked to answer the questions and return the questionnaire to the researchers.
Print media campaigns are also implemented. The first targets young adults with the theme of ‘Don’t provide alcohol to those under 21.’ Other print media products include calendars for alcohol merchants, newsletters for students and adults, and a celebration poster for the many participants in Project Northland over the years of the study.
In addition, youth action teams are formed in Phase II. Young people are recruited for participation in teams to influence alcohol use among their peers. The teams meet as an extracurricular activity, assisted by adult coordinators.

Implementation Experiences

Feedback date

Contact details

Krzysztof Ostaszewski
ostasz[a]ipin.edu.pl

Main obstacles

With respect to individual professionals

1. Reforms that shifted responsibility for social policy (including alcohol and drug prevention) to local communities and the non-governmental organisation (NGO) sector without sufficient preparation, training and resources.

As a result, in substance use prevention, school and community-based financial mechanisms support bottom-up initiatives conducted by local NGOs that lack experience in prevention programming and evaluation. Mainstream practices in the field of prevention consist of ad hoc programmes and actions. Most implemented activities are school-based programmes/actions prepared by teachers and are a compilation of previous ideas and scenarios, one-time initiatives, theatre productions in schools, special events in the local communities (picnics, family parties), competitions, sport events, and other leisure time activities.

2. The low level of interest of schools and local governments in evidence-based programmes.

Although our programmes (PDD and FM) were readily available to schools in Poland, their implementation was relatively small. In the first decade of 2000 more than 100 000 students participated in the PDD and FM programmes, mostly from small towns and villages. Annually, approximately 10 000 students took part in PDD and 3 000 students took part in the two-year programme (PDD + FM). This constitutes only a small proportion (1.0-5.0 %) of 10- to11-year-old Polish pupils.

3. Organisational problems schools face when implementing the programme.

Evidence-based programmes are more challenging for schools, more expensive for local authorities and more time-consuming for teachers and other school staff. Because of this, schools faced several organisational problems, including a very tight timetable for implementation of the programme in classrooms, a lack of continuity in funding and support for preventive actions from local governments, a relatively low level of teachers’ motivation to implement preventive actions, and insufficient support for teachers (in their opinion) from their school principals.

With respect to social context

The dissemination of the programme was difficult due to the limited interest in evidence-based programmes among local governments (in Poland, 99 % of preventive activities are financed by local governments).

With respect to organisational and economic context

Limited financial resources:

1. We received permission for the non-commercial use of Project Northland in Poland. This situation limited the possibilities of cooperation with NGOs or small educational businesses during the dissemination of the programme.

2. Obtaining a grant for applied research was difficult due to its low status in the system of scientific grants.

How they overcame the obstacles

With respect to individual professionals

1. The development of evidence-based prevention of risky behaviours in young people is not among the state’s priorities. There is a lack of the integrated social milieu that is needed to form a lobby for a new system based on a comprehensive and cohesive vision of contemporary knowledge on health promotion and prevention. Prevention science around substance use and other risky behaviours does not have high prestige in Poland and loses the race for funding against a strong and well-organised lobby that supports research on cardiology, oncology and other salient public health problems. Politicians responsible for social policy and public health issues believe that substance use/risky behaviour prevention programmes do not require research methods. The concept of evidence-based methods commonly used in clinical medical practice is almost unknown in the area of prevention. As a consequence, the research infrastructure available for prevention science is insufficient.

2. Some efforts are being made to improve the quality of prevention programmes. A group for prevention programmes assessment and recommendation was established to recommend relevant, best-practice prevention programmes to schools and local communities. The expert group consists of representatives of the State Agency for Prevention of Alcohol Related Problems (PARPA), the National Bureau for Drug Prevention (KBPN), the Center for Education Development (ORE) and the Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology (IPiN). These national-level institutions play important roles in the public health area by supervising substance use/risky behaviour prevention activities in Poland. The improvement of the quality of prevention programmes is a shared priority for all institutions involved in this project. To date, 20 programmes have been recommended based on their well-informed concept and good or promising evaluation results, but this number does not correspond to the needs.

With respect to social context

Our team was active in the promotion of knowledge about science-based prevention and the creation (together with national agencies) of a Polish system of recommendation of the prevention and health promotion programmes.

With respect to organisational and economic context

The highly motivated and committed authors of the Polish adaptation of the programmes facilitated both research projects and implemented the programme without sufficient funds and sufficient payment for this hard work.

Lessons learnt

With respect to individual professionals

The support of national-level institutions is needed to influence the traditional thinking about prevention. The situation in Poland changed when the management of government agencies responsible for national drug and alcohol policy learnt about evidence-based prevention and started to participate in international cooperation (e.g. twinning projects, study visits, conferences, networks, the European Society for Prevention Research (EUSPR)

A sufficient funding system is needed to support both prevention programming and evaluation, which are worthless without it.

With respect to social context

The same as abovementioned

With respect to organisational and economic context

The same as abovementioned

Strengths

  • Well-structured and ready-to-use programmes greatly help school staff to implement a good prevention programme.
  • Implementation of these programmes helps schools to create good relationships with parents, which is a sensitive issue in most Polish schools.
  • Interactive methods and the participation of peer leaders make these programmes attractive for pupils and parents.

Weaknesses

  • Lack of an established system to train teachers to use our programmes.
  • A limited number of instructors who can train teachers.

Opportunities

  • A system of recommendation that supports our programmes and creates pressure on schools and local governments.
  • Some public funding that is connected with the implementation of recommended prevention programmes.

Threats

  • A low level of political interest in supporting evidence-based prevention.
  • The low level of interest of the Ministry of Education in evidence-based programmes and, as a consequence, no room at schools for more challenging and time-consuming programmes.

Recommendations

With respect to individual professionals

Extra money and institutional support for teachers and others who deliver evidence-based prevention programmes.

With respect to social context

The participation of government institutions that are responsible for national drug and alcohol policymaking.

With respect to organisational and economic context

A distinct institution at the state level that is established to support the development of well-informed prevention programmes or to fund serious prevention research.

Note from the authors

There are two programmes that are connected to each other:
1. Program Domowych Detektywów PDD (American name: Slick Tracy Home Team) and
2. Fantastyczne Możliwosci FM (American name: Amazing Alternatives!)
They were both taken from the US Project Northland and adapted to the Polish cultural context. They were implemented country-wide in 1999.

Number of implementations

2

Country

Top