Continuing care to improve treatment outcomes

Summary of the evidence

Rating
  • Likely to be beneficial

Continuing care, i.e. interventions following the initial period of more intensive care aimed at manage and sustain recovery (including cognitive behavioural therapies (CBT), recovery management check-ups, 12-step or self-help and technology based interventions) was found in a systematic review with meta-analysis (Blodgett  et al., 2014, 19 studies, N=3542) to be more effective than control conditions on:

  • at least one substance use outcome (Hedges’ g = 0.187,  p< 0.001)

The same meta-analysis also found that

  • longer planned treatments did not have larger effects sizes than studies with shorter prescribed periods of treatment
  • there was no significant difference between treatments with protocol-specified intervention sessions and those without planned sessions per week

These results were confirmed by another systematic review without meta-analysis (Dennis et al., 2014) that looked specifically at the effects of different types of continuing care:  

  • behavioural therapies showed promising results on use and retention in treatment outcomes, especially for moderate severity clients recovery managements check-ups are primarily effective in linking people back to treatment more robust evidence is still needed for self-help groups and technology-based interventions
Top